View Full Version : The Ultimate JOHN KERRY AD!!
O P T i C S
10-19-2004, 04:11 PM
http://www.wabcradio.com/listingsentryheadline.asp?ID=259078&PT=WABC+News
Czigga
10-19-2004, 11:04 PM
Oh shit here we go....
Everyone download Eminem "Mosh" to even the playing field...
Forsythe
10-20-2004, 12:58 AM
lol entering flamecity, population - soon
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 01:25 AM
Oh shit here we go....
Everyone download Eminem "Mosh" to even the playing field...
Do it. Then listen to the Video again, Kerry's lies are getting even funnier now that he is falling again after going "3 - 0" in the debates, how fucking pathetic you "win" every debate and the president starts pulling away. KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE
EJNelly
10-20-2004, 01:27 AM
LMAO, that owned.
PYMPTYPE
10-20-2004, 01:30 AM
did yall see the clip today or yesterday of where bush said "we will not have an all volunteer army"
that was LMAO
EJNelly
10-20-2004, 01:32 AM
Man, I missed it. I just need to record anytime Bush is speaking. Time to get TIVO.
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 01:54 AM
did yall see the clip today or yesterday of where bush said "we will not have an all volunteer army"
that was LMAO
i was LMAO today when Bush said we would have an all Volunteer army.
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 01:55 AM
i was LMAO when John Kerry has to start name calling, calling Cheneys daughter not Gay, but a Lesbian.
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 01:57 AM
"I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it." yet he still says that bush didnt give the army what they needed, yet he voted against giving them the money!
thats a LMAO
SeventhVirgo
10-20-2004, 03:08 AM
:rolleyes:
Wheelz
10-20-2004, 06:33 AM
liberal or republican, you have to see the humour in that
Forsythe
10-20-2004, 12:56 PM
lol wheelz "feeding the fire are we?"
SeventhVirgo
10-20-2004, 01:29 PM
I don't want either Kerry or Bush to be president, but if I had to choose, it would be Kerry, honestly. I didn't find that 'ad' funny either, I only did laugh, however, when I saw that ridiculous face on that guy in the webpage.
GoAtankGo
10-20-2004, 01:36 PM
lol, owned...
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 01:39 PM
I don't want either Kerry or Bush to be president, but if I had to choose, it would be Kerry, honestly. I didn't find that 'ad' funny either, I only did laugh, however, when I saw that ridiculous face on that guy in the webpage.
Well i feel bad for you then.
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 02:03 PM
omg when i read this is was like LMAO
COUNTDOWN TO ELECTION DAY
Yasser Arafat endorses Kerry
Thinks Democratic senator 'better for Palestinian cause'
LOL IM A STUPID MOTHER FUCKER, AND I VOTE
wait thats optics, my abd
ps iran endorses bush
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 04:11 PM
LOL IM A STUPID MOTHER FUCKER, AND I VOTE
wait thats optics, my abd
ps iran endorses bush
proof??!@??!@?!?!? and it is O P T i C S to you my young arrogant friend.
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 04:13 PM
oh wait did you get Bush and Kerry mixed up?
Meanwhile, with Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei telling state-run newspapers that Iran will use nuclear weapons to “destroy the Zionist entity,” hundreds of thousands of dollars have been given to Kerry from the pro-Iranian lobby, possibly influencing the presidential candidate’s startling call to provide Tehran with the nuclear fuel it seeks, according to Iran’s Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy chairman Aryo Pirouznia.
Pirouznia disclosed details of Kerry’s alleged financial ties to backers of the mullah government in Iran, the most prominent of which is through Hassan Nemazee, an investment banker who has joined the board of the American-Iranian Council, a U.S. lobbying group that supports lifting U.S. sanctions on Iran and accommodating the Tehran regime. Nemazee admits to raising more than $500,000 for the senator’s campaign.
SeventhVirgo
10-20-2004, 06:12 PM
http://www.blackassassins.org/forum/showthread.php?t=9881
Looks like you might not be able to vote after all optics.
O P T i C S
10-20-2004, 06:22 PM
http://www.blackassassins.org/forum/showthread.php?t=9881
Looks like you might not be able to vote after all optics.
ahahah your so funny!!! Idiot.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&ncid=696&e=2&u=/ap/20041019/ap_on_el_pr/iran_us_elections
Bush Recieves Endorsement From Iran
TEHRAN, Iran - The head of Iran's security council said Tuesday that the re-election of President Bush was in Tehran's best interests, despite the administration's axis of evil label, accusations that Iran harbors al-Qaida terrorists and threats of sanctions over the country's nuclear ambitions.
gg no re
we need a damn politics forums, for all of these political newbs to bitch at eachother and not disturb my players lounge
were not in the players lounge newb
Massacure
10-20-2004, 10:01 PM
You also need to allow registered members to post new threads in here, especially if the people who are capable of it are not happy moving the threads themselves.
PYMPTYPE
10-20-2004, 10:42 PM
this is whats wrong with america and democracy, optics vote counts just as much as mine. WTF is that. hax.
Forsythe
10-21-2004, 12:47 AM
hax lmao
EJNelly
10-21-2004, 01:31 AM
LMAO at everyone ganging up on O P T i C S, because he doesn't think that Kerry is the greatest candidate ever. Clark owned all Democrats in the primary's and anyone with half a brain would have voted for him.
The clip was a completely accurate mockery of Kerry, I just love the way he gets all pissy when someone points out something stupid he did. Just like his wife "I didn't say that."
Kiron
11-04-2004, 05:49 PM
lol, i vote for RALPH NADER. GO RALPH.
Shiz, voting already over? BULL SHIT
Always next you raplh, always next year...
Chrono69x
11-04-2004, 07:28 PM
lol, i vote for RALPH NADER. GO RALPH.
Shiz, voting already over? BULL SHIT
Always next you raplh, always next year...
Or 4 years from now for everyone else...
Czigga
11-05-2004, 12:47 AM
GG kerry good try with the spin though
wow you vote for ralph nader? thats even stupider than voting for bush.
lmao at KERRY "spin"
america sucks
and canada apparently
Chrono69x
11-05-2004, 04:55 PM
liberal or republican, you have to see the humour in that
If you're using "liberal" you'd have to compare that with conservative, not republican. Republican would be used if you had said "Democratic".
LOL IM A STUPID MOTHER FUCKER, AND I VOTE
wait thats optics, my abd
ps iran endorses bush
Wait, so Optics is a "stupid mother fucker" because he has views different from your own? Because he doesn't agree with your obviously biased views, he's labeled a "stupid mother fucker" ??
Talk about ignorance, stupidity, arrogance, and intollerance all in one go...good job idiot.
this is whats wrong with america and democracy, optics vote counts just as much as mine. WTF is that. hax.
And you're obviously MUCH more intelligent than him, taking every fucking conspiracy theory in the world for face value. The fact that you have as much say in the world as somebody who actually takes a second to think rationally is just sad.
Czigga
11-06-2004, 02:08 AM
Don't bother reasoning with them, they'll figure it out on their own one day when they graduate 11th grade
Wait, so Optics is a "stupid mother fucker" because he has views different from your own? Because he doesn't agree with your obviously biased views, he's labeled a "stupid mother fucker" ??
Talk about ignorance, stupidity, arrogance, and intollerance all in one go...good job idiot.
And you're obviously MUCH more intelligent than him, taking every fucking conspiracy theory in the world for face value. The fact that you have as much say in the world as somebody who actually takes a second to think rationally is just sad.
lol im not allowed to say someone is stupid, but then you say i'm stupid. that's pretty fuckin stupid holmes, you just proved yourself retarded. i don't think he's stupid for having a different opinion then me. I forget who said it, but I heard recently this quote (and im messing it up a little) "everyone can have their own opinions, but everyone CANT have their own facts" I don't think anyone is stupid if they have a different opinion, but if they believe wrong facts and then base opinions BASED on wrong facts, then yes I'll think they're stupid.
O P T i C S
11-06-2004, 02:09 PM
Ok, what fact was i wrong on? Oh wait i just have different views then you.
Chrono69x
11-06-2004, 04:20 PM
lol im not allowed to say someone is stupid, but then you say i'm stupid. that's pretty fuckin stupid holmes, you just proved yourself retarded. i don't think he's stupid for having a different opinion then me. I forget who said it, but I heard recently this quote (and im messing it up a little) "everyone can have their own opinions, but everyone CANT have their own facts" I don't think anyone is stupid if they have a different opinion, but if they believe wrong facts and then base opinions BASED on wrong facts, then yes I'll think they're stupid.
Yes, I am allowed to say you are. Do you know why? Obviously not.
You call somebody stupid for their political views. I called you stupid because of your insistance on being a complete, radical, belligerent dick.
In case you're not sure, there IS a small difference between the two reasons.
You didn't call him stupid for believing in "wrong facts" because at the time you posted that, he didn't have any "wrong facts". In case you don't remember, you said:
LOL IM A STUPID MOTHER FUCKER, AND I VOTE
wait thats optics, my abd
ps iran endorses bush
Now every post by Optics previous to that had been something that he was laughing his ass off over. He stated obvious facts that he beleived to be funny. There were no falsities in what he said. Therefore, what you just said was bullshit.
you were wrong in saying iran endoresed kerry, in this very thread
you cant call someone stupid for their "political views" but you can for your own interpretation of them as a person? I would like to see this definition of stupid. Cause it seems like you made it up just now.
just because he didnt say anything factually wrong in that one post doesn't mean he never has, and I could bring it up whenever i want.
Chrono69x
11-06-2004, 08:08 PM
you were wrong in saying iran endoresed kerry, in this very thread
you cant call someone stupid for their "political views" but you can for your own interpretation of them as a person? I would like to see this definition of stupid. Cause it seems like you made it up just now.
just because he didnt say anything factually wrong in that one post doesn't mean he never has, and I could bring it up whenever i want.
How was he wrong in saying Iran endoresed kerry when he even provided a quote CITING that very thing??
As to your second question...Uh..yea, that's about it. Someone is not less intelligent than you because they hold different beliefs. Your arrogance, intollerance, ignorance and belligerence have all proven you're not intelligent; intelligent people usually are able to grasp SIMPLE things such as common curtousy.
n 1: a poor ability to understand or to profit from experience
Your inability to even start understanding where optics is coming from ALSO shows your stupidity.
Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
Here's another definition of stupid. You made a poor decision / careless mistake in flaming optics in this thread just because you don't agree with his political views. Stupidity.
just because he didnt say anything factually wrong in that one post doesn't mean he never has, and I could bring it up whenever i want.
Which one post? There have been many in this thread by him. You could try and articulate your ideas a bit better...
man you guys are stupid
How was he wrong in saying Iran endoresed kerry when he even provided a quote CITING that very thing??
uhh, no, maybe you better reread his quote and mine. According to his quote, which I have no idea where it came from by the way, some people in Iran donated money to Kerry. Not the government. Meanwhile, in my quote, in an official statement, in an AP article titled "BUSH RECIEVES ENDORSEMENT FROM IRAN," the head of Iran's security counsil did just that, endorsed Bush.
As to your second question...Uh..yea, that's about it. Someone is not less intelligent than you because they hold different beliefs. Your arrogance, intollerance, ignorance and belligerence have all proven you're not intelligent; intelligent people usually are able to grasp SIMPLE things such as common curtousy.
first of all, where have i been ignorant in this thread? The ashcroft thing? Ok I'm not perfect, I can admit that, but not being perfect doesn't maybe you stupid. Arrogance, intolerance, billigerance? These are all qualities optics has shown many times in the past. Not to mention that these have nothing to do with stupidity. I could easily say you're coming off as being very rude to me. But that doesn't maybe you stupid. Its the MEAT of what you say that makes you stupid.
Your inability to even start understanding where optics is coming from ALSO shows your stupidity.
Here's another definition of stupid. You made a poor decision / careless mistake in flaming optics in this thread just because you don't agree with his political views. Stupidity.
How do I have an inability to understand where optics is coming from? What the hell are you talking about? I understand where he's coming from, he's an idiot whose been decieved into thinking that George Bush being elected is good for him. Or he's really rich or religious, but I'm guessing its not one of those. Wait, so now its a poor decision to DISAGREE WITH SOMEONE? OR TO BRING UP FACTS THAT SHOW SOMEONE WAS WRONG? I know you just made up this bullshit point to go with the definition you gave, but this is what's wrong with Bush's America, you sound exactly like them when they go if you disagree with us you're being unpatriotic. I'm sorry but disagreement and "flaming" is what message boards are all about, why the hell else would I come here, for "this is gayest thread ever"?
Which one post? There have been many in this thread by him. You could try and articulate your ideas a bit better...
not that it really matters, but i was referring to this post
omg when i read this is was like LMAO
Quote:
COUNTDOWN TO ELECTION DAY
Yasser Arafat endorses Kerry
Thinks Democratic senator 'better for Palestinian cause'
and by the way, don't talk to me about articulating my ideas better, mr. I spell every other word wrong.
O P T i C S
11-07-2004, 02:30 PM
ok i wasnt going to say anything but if you are going to say that i was brainwashed and MY OPINION on if George Bush is good for me or not you are arrogant. That is the same as me saying you are stupid because you have been brainwashed to think hes bad or wrose then Kerry by the liberal media, and the radical left wing.
and by the way, don't talk to me about articulating my ideas better, mr. I spell every other word wrong.
o now i see this is to chrono but maybe you should work on your spelling and grammar before you lecture him on misspellings.
on your first point, brainwashed is a strong word, one that I did not used. Maybe it really is very important to you that two dudes can't get married or that a girl can't get an abortion. Or maybe you're a millionare who benefits greatly from having Bush in power. Or maybe you just really hate brown people. Otherwise, yeah dude, you have no reason to vote for Bush.
and i wouldn't have brought up the spelling thing, cause yeah I don't care too much about it here, but if he's going to attack me on a similiar issue of course I'll bring up his spelling.
O P T i C S
11-07-2004, 04:21 PM
I understand where he's coming from, he's an idiot whose been decieved into thinking that George Bush being elected is good for him.
You didnt edit this :\ i could have sworn i read brainwashed earlier.
I dont care if you do not like Bush at all and think im an idiot. But imo Bush is way better then Kerry, so i guess if its really important to you for women to have the right to murder there babies because they couldnt use protection, or you are gay, or you need the government to hold your hand because you cant do anything for your self you have no reason to vote for kerry, Thats just using your logic (Y)
really i didnt know murdering babies was an issue this election. cause if that was it, i'd be like no way, i am against murdering babies. now if you're talking about aborting embryos, which are very very different than babies, then yes women should of course have the right to do that. i agree that its better to use protection, but what about a woman thats raped? what about when the protection doesn't work (nothings 100%)? these are not babies were talking about. i'm not gay, but just because i'm not gay doesn't mean they shouldn't have the rights we have. first its banning gay marriage, next its banning inter-racial marriage, which is something that could effect me personally. Basically, if you are against gay marriage, you are flat out saying that you are intolerant of other people.
Chrono69x
11-07-2004, 07:32 PM
man you guys are stupid
uhh, no, maybe you better reread his quote and mine. According to his quote, which I have no idea where it came from by the way, some people in Iran donated money to Kerry. Not the government. Meanwhile, in my quote, in an official statement, in an AP article titled "BUSH RECIEVES ENDORSEMENT FROM IRAN," the head of Iran's security counsil did just that, endorsed Bush.
pulled from the same post of Optics'
Pirouznia disclosed details of Kerry’s alleged financial ties to backers of the mullah government in Iran
And the financial stability of the Mullah government is really SO much different from the Government itself, huh?
Something which totally supports the government can't be associated or related to the Government in the least bit, can it?
first of all, where have i been ignorant in this thread? The ashcroft thing? Ok I'm not perfect, I can admit that, but not being perfect doesn't maybe you stupid. Arrogance, intolerance, billigerance? These are all qualities optics has shown many times in the past. Not to mention that these have nothing to do with stupidity. I could easily say you're coming off as being very rude to me. But that doesn't maybe you stupid. Its the MEAT of what you say that makes you stupid.
First you ask where you've been ignorant, then you answer your own question...
But that's beside the point. I didn't say you were just stupid, in fact, the first things I did mention WERE those things which you deemed didn't matter because they " have nothing to do with stupidity".
Again, I didn't say stupidity was your only issue...
I also didn't say Optics hasn't shown these qualities in the past. The fact of the matter is, this time around you had a complete disregard for any sort of decency, and instead insisted on flaming optics because of the aforementioned issues that you have. The fact that you're trying to shrug this off as if you're not at fault for anything also shows your stupidity.
I could easily say you're coming off as being very rude to me. But that doesn't maybe you stupid. Its the MEAT of what you say that makes you stupid. [/quote]
You could, and you'd be right to an extent. The difference is, my post was a reactionary response to your absolutely heinous display, while yours was simply out of spite / intollerance.
and by the way, don't talk to me about articulating my ideas better, mr. I spell every other word wrong.
wait thats optics, my abd
But that doesn't maybe you stupid.
That's a bit of a double standard, is it not? Especially when I have far less misspellings than you :\
first its banning gay marriage, next its banning inter-racial marriage, which is something that could effect me personally. Basically, if you are against gay marriage, you are flat out saying that you are intolerant of other people.
Do you even know the arguments behind banning gay marriage? Do you know the diffence between gay marriage and gay union ?
Do you realize that Union hasn't been fully adressed, however due to polls, chances of gay union passing is very high ?
Prokopis
11-07-2004, 07:48 PM
I like the word heinous - it reminds me of something else :classic:.
PS: BTW, elections are over; can't we all just get back to hating eachother, but not showing it?
O P T i C S
11-07-2004, 08:13 PM
really i didnt know murdering babies was an issue this election. cause if that was it, i'd be like no way, i am against murdering babies. now if you're talking about aborting embryos, which are very very different than babies, then yes women should of course have the right to do that. i agree that its better to use protection, but what about a woman thats raped? what about when the protection doesn't work (nothings 100%)? these are not babies were talking about. i'm not gay, but just because i'm not gay doesn't mean they shouldn't have the rights we have. first its banning gay marriage, next its banning inter-racial marriage, which is something that could effect me personally. Basically, if you are against gay marriage, you are flat out saying that you are intolerant of other people.
Hey im just using your logic, if your gay you vote for kerry. Rape? Get the day after pill. If you think you are mature enough to have sex and you are mature enough to have sex you need to deal with the consequences of what happens, im not completly against abortion im just against abortion in most caes. It does not make you intolerant btw to be against gay marriage its a matter of opinion, some people look at marriage different.
pulled from the same post of Optics'
And the financial stability of the Mullah government is really SO much different from the Government itself, huh?
Something which totally supports the government can't be associated or related to the Government in the least bit, can it?
just because something is associated with something doesn't mean they're the same thing, this is a really basic fact that i don't see how you can misinterperet.
I didn't say you were just stupid, in fact, the first things I did mention WERE those things which you deemed didn't matter because they " have nothing to do with stupidity".
ok, you can call me rude, thats open to interperetation and i agree i'm not being as polite as i could be, but you're the one taking an insanely rude tone with me, talking like you're so much better then me when you really don't know shit. as for stupidity, you said i was stupid, and couldn't back it up at all. sorry.
Again, I didn't say stupidity was your only issue...
I also didn't say Optics hasn't shown these qualities in the past. The fact of the matter is, this time around you had a complete disregard for any sort of decency, and instead insisted on flaming optics because of the aforementioned issues that you have.
The fact that you're trying to shrug this off as if you're not at fault for anything also shows your stupidity.
first of all, agian, this shows you have no idea what the word stupid means. This isn't my fault. When optics acts like a stupid asshole as he did in this thread before I showed up, I'm gonna flame him. It's funny how you're the one attacking me for this, and not him. Grow some balls, it's a fucking message board, it's for flames. I'm not shrugging this off as it's not my fault, I'm saying there's nobody at fault. I disagree with optics, but if he acts like an asshole, I'm just gonna act like an asshole back, im not gonna preach to him and tell him that he shows no decency. It's a fucking message board.
You could, and you'd be right to an extent. The difference is, my post was a reactionary response to your absolutely heinous display, while yours was simply out of spite / intollerance.
no, mine was a reactionary response to optics' absolutely heinous display. your's was simply out of spite / intollerance.
That's a bit of a double standard, is it not? Especially when I have far less misspellings than you :\
you're the one with a double standard. again, I don't particularly care about this issue, but if you're going to attack me on my clarity then of course i'm gonna point out that in many cases you don't use correct grammar or spelling. Again, I don't give a shit, you brought it up.
Do you even know the arguments behind banning gay marriage? Do you know the diffence between gay marriage and gay union ?
Do you realize that Union hasn't been fully adressed, however due to polls, chances of gay union passing is very high ?
Yes, I do know the difference. But marriage does not belong to christians who believe that marriage is only between a man and a woman. If gay people want to be MARRIED, they have every right to be. Marriage does not have to be religous, you can get married by a judge. Why take away their right to be married? Tell me. By the way, the same people who are against gay marriage are almost always also against gay union. The whole point is that these people don't care really about the "sanctity of marriage." They just want to do anything they can to take away the rights of gay people. They just want to do anything they can to make it suck to be gay.
Hey im just using your logic, if your gay you vote for kerry. Rape? Get the day after pill. If you think you are mature enough to have sex and you are mature enough to have sex you need to deal with the consequences of what happens, im not completly against abortion im just against abortion in most caes. It does not make you intolerant btw to be against gay marriage its a matter of opinion, some people look at marriage different.
First of all, I have no idea how you're using my logic, because I have no idea how you're logic works. It's not even that I necesarially disagree with you, it's just I'm having a really hard time following you're overall point. But that sentence, that if you are mature enough to have sex you need to deal with the consequences, that's just ridiculous. YOU DON'T NEED TO DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES. How abuot this. If you are mature enough to play football, and get tackled and break a few bones, you can't get medical treatment, because you're mature enough to face the consequences. If you're walking down the street and get shot, you can't get treated medically, because if you're mature enough to walk down the street, you've gotta deal with the consequences. That's your arguement.
And your last sentence is hilarious. I'm gonna quote it again:
does not make you intolerant btw to be against gay marriage its a matter of opinion, some people look at marriage different.
Ok I want everyone to read this one more time. Ok, got it? Good. YES, THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF INTOLERANCE. You're absolutely right: "some people look at marriage different." That's why it's intolerant of the people who see marriage as a union between two people, be they man and wife, man and man, or woman and woman, to be against gay marriage. It's intolerant of them because marriage CAN be looked at in different ways, and if you decide to just look at it the way where it excludes certain people, yes, that's quite intolerant.
O P T i C S
11-07-2004, 11:18 PM
When optics acts like a stupid asshole as he did in this thread before I showed up, I'm gonna flame him. Good fucking joke kid, the only reason i posted any of that is because pymptype made a "heinous" post first. So i did the same thing he did with things kerry said. Please comparing ending and unborn babies life to broken bones? You cry about intolerance yet your a pompous ass hole about any of my beliefs. Its quite funny.
wow you vote for ralph nader? thats even stupider than voting for bush.
lmao at KERRY "spin"
america sucks
and canada apparently
Canada owns, its politicians suck
optics you fucking moron, i dont give a shit who started it, why dont you reread what im trying to say.
im arguing with you. if you see disagreing with you as not tolerating your beliefs, then either you're fucking baby in which you should grow up and stop crying, or you realize you have no way to counter my arguement so you bring up some bullshit like that. I tolerate your ideas, sure, keep them, but they're wrong, that is, they're based on wrong thinking. It has just nothing to do with intolerance.
i was referring to that kiron is from canada and that he sucks. if other people in canada are better than him then i apologize.
O P T i C S
11-08-2004, 11:29 PM
very tolerant to call someone an idiot, and stupid for having other ideas and beliefs
i dont cry i dont even care its just when hypocrits with double standards start argueing with me i find it humorous.
gg no re
Czigga
11-09-2004, 12:06 AM
Ffskids
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.